Blog

Can Battlefield and CoD coexist?10/21/11By David Knight

Battlefield or Call of Duty? As Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 approach, it’s hard to avoid this debate. As a longtime Battlefield player, I’ve always been perplexed why these two franchises are even compared.Sure, they’re both first-person shooters with loyal multiplayer followings, but that’s about all they have in common.

Anyone who’s spent a considerable amount of time playing Battlefield and Call of Duty can tell you that the games are very different. That became even more apparent last June when we had a chance to sit-in on a focus group showcasing Battlefield 3.

Unknown to the participants, the focus group was run by EA to help gather objective, un-biased feedback on Battlefield 3. The participants were all hardcore FPS gamers, many of which had never played a Battlefield game before. In fact, most of the participants were huge Call of Duty fans.

The gamers arrived at a nondescript office building outside of LA only knowing they would be playing a game and asked some questions afterward. They didn’t know what game they’d be playing and they had no idea the whole session was arranged by EA.

Apparently such deception is standard operating procedure when running focus groups in an effort to preserve objectivity. Gamers filed in and out of the office for nearly two whole days, arriving at their scheduled time to play.

Upon arrival, the participants were ushered into a room filled with high-end PCs. Since we were guests of EA, we were allowed to sit behind a two-way mirror and watch as the players worked their way through an early build of Operation Metro’s Rush mode; probably the most CoD-friendly map.

While everyone seemed to figure out the controls, within a few minutes of each session, it was easy to spot the few gamers who had played a Battlefield game before.

They took a more methodical approach to attacking and defending the M-COM stations. Also, they seemed to have a better grasp of how to use the classes, dropping medkits and ammo boxes for their teammates. Even more impressive was how some Battlefield veterans took leadership roles, helping their teammates understand the nuances of the game mode. Before long a room full of strangers were playing as a team, utilizing the spotting feature, squad spawning, and other supportive actions.

After playing two rounds of Rush, approximately eight gamers were selected out of each group to participate in a group discussion. Once again, we were allowed to watch one of these discussions from behind a two-way mirror. A moderator asking a variety of questions directed each discussion.

To my surprise, some of the most energetic feedback came from CoD players. Although they admitted they weren’t familiar with everything in the game, they were definitely intrigued by the unique pacing and teamplay elements offered by Battlefield 3. They came away realizing there’s much more to succeeding in Battlefield than just racking-up kills and kill streaks, allowing for a greater variety of play styles.

The discussion we witnessed went on for more than an hour before ending with a two-part question: how many would consider buying Modern Warfare 3? Most of the gamers raised their hands, one even admitting he wasn’t enthusiastic, but felt a sense of loyalty to Infinity Ward. Then the moderator asked how many would consider buying Battlefield 3…every hand shot up.

This only confirmed something I’ve always believed: CoD and Battlefield offer very different gameplay experiences and there’s room for both to succeed, even in a crowded shooter market. CoD emphasizes fast-paced, twitch gaming while Battlefield takes a more tactical approach, where a fast trigger finger isn’t the only way to rise through the ranks.

Given the popularity of CoD, Battlefield definitely has an uphill fight. But I was surprised by how warmly Battlefield 3 was received by hardened CoD players looking for a change of scenery. Hopefully more CoD players will discover the depth and variety offered by Battlefield 3. With so much quality, there’s no reason why gamers should limit themselves to just one online FPS shooter this season.

8 comments

REZOAN says:
11/19/11 - I like COD MW3 . But Battlefild 3 is not bad
Bawal Ito says:
11/15/11 - I like both but they are different FPS games. The replayability of BF3 is much more for me IMHO.
Fezzgig says:
11/11/11 - Great Blog! I have to agree with LordBlackMane's post. If I were to play just for the campain then CoD would take it. As for Multi Player BF3 hands down. BF3 is definately superior for a team based game and who doesn't like destruction :) Both games are pretty awsome and it is great to have choices out there for the different playing styles.
10/28/11 - Battlefield 3 you're campaign game is too short this is more online game It's geared for multiplayer than single player gutted completed within 6 hours bored now
10/28/11 - i think battlefield is a better game but COD is good to, it is just that battlefield is a way crazier game online and when you go play a call of duty game you feel so restricted because you can't blow up a wall to escape gun fire and it's unreal how battlefield 3 looks with this new engine why couldn't infinity ward create a new engine for Modern Warfare 3, all i am trying to say is Dice put more work into Battlefield 3, creating the new engine and everything and MW3 is going to look like MW2 but i do like Call of Duties single player more
10/27/11 - Great Blog! I Bought battlefield 3 love it and am going to but cod mw3 as i like the campaigns, i think both should put more into the campaign.
CheoMD says:
10/27/11 - Great blog! I am a fan of CoD and play it with my sons and I borought the Battlefield 3 home and I was impresed with the way the game plays and my sons liked so much that they want a copy of the game to play on line. We are waiting to see if the CoD 3 is as good as Battlefiel 3. For now I will keep playing Battlefiel 3 to get use to the game play. Now I have two games that I like to play so I will be OCUPIED on CHRISTMAS! :-)
MzzFaith says:
10/26/11 - Awesome blog! I always get the same question at work... CoD vs. Battlefield? I don't pick one over the other; I explain the differences between the two as well as the similarities in the fact that yes, they are both FPS. Thank you for this, my thoughts exactly. =)

Please to post your comment

Need to register? click here


 
Save 50% off any Prima Official eGuide on PrimaGames.com!